The “Return of the Subject” As a Historico‐Intellectual Problem
Identifieur interne : 000F32 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000F31; suivant : 000F33The “Return of the Subject” As a Historico‐Intellectual Problem
Auteurs : Elías Palti [Argentine]Source :
- History and Theory [ 0018-2656 ] ; 2004-02.
Abstract
Recently, a call for the “return of the subject” has gained increasing influence. The power of this call is intimately linked to the assumption that there is a necessary connection between “the subject” and politics (and ultimately, history). Without a subject, it is alleged, there can be no agency, and therefore no emancipatory projects—and, thus, no history. This paper discusses the precise epistemological foundations for this claim. It shows that the idea of a necessary link between “the subject” and agency, and therefore between the subject and politics (and history) is only one among many different ones that appeared in the course of the four centuries that modernity spans. It has precise historico‐intellectual premises, ones that cannot be traced back in time before the end of the nineteenth century. Failing to observe the historicity of the notion of the subject, and projecting it as a kind of universal category, results, as we shall see, in serious incongruence and anachronisms. The essay outlines a definite view of intellectual history aimed at recovering the radically contingent nature of conceptual formations, which, it alleges, is the still‐valid core of Foucault's archeological project. Regardless of the inconsistencies in his own archeological endeavors, his archeological approach intended to establish in intellectual history a principle of temporal irreversibility immanent in it. Following his lead, the essay attempts to discern the different meanings the category of the subject has historically acquired, referring them back to the broader epistemic reconfigurations that have occurred in Western thought. This reveals a richness of meanings in this category that are obliterated under the general label of the “modern subject”; at the same time, it illuminates some of the methodological problems that mar current debates on the topic.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2004.00265.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000032
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000032
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000C59
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000F37
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000F32
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The “Return of the Subject” As a Historico‐Intellectual Problem</title><author><name sortKey="Palti, Elias" sort="Palti, Elias" uniqKey="Palti E" first="Elías" last="Palti">Elías Palti</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F1A0B9F17A6E9D855C97075CFA269E2B1FA9EBCC</idno><date when="2004" year="2004">2004</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1468-2303.2004.00265.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F1A0B9F17A6E9D855C97075CFA269E2B1FA9EBCC/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000032</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000032</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000032</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000C59</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000C59</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0018-2656:2004:Palti E:the:return:of</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000F37</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000F32</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000F32</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The “Return of the Subject” As a Historico‐Intellectual Problem</title><author><name sortKey="Palti, Elias" sort="Palti, Elias" uniqKey="Palti E" first="Elías" last="Palti">Elías Palti</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Argentine</country><wicri:regionArea>Universidad National de Quilmes—CONICET Buenos Aires</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">History and Theory</title><idno type="ISSN">0018-2656</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-2303</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-02">2004-02</date><biblScope unit="volume">43</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="57">57</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="82">82</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0018-2656</idno></series><idno type="istex">F1A0B9F17A6E9D855C97075CFA269E2B1FA9EBCC</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1468-2303.2004.00265.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">HITH265</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0018-2656</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Recently, a call for the “return of the subject” has gained increasing influence. The power of this call is intimately linked to the assumption that there is a necessary connection between “the subject” and politics (and ultimately, history). Without a subject, it is alleged, there can be no agency, and therefore no emancipatory projects—and, thus, no history. This paper discusses the precise epistemological foundations for this claim. It shows that the idea of a necessary link between “the subject” and agency, and therefore between the subject and politics (and history) is only one among many different ones that appeared in the course of the four centuries that modernity spans. It has precise historico‐intellectual premises, ones that cannot be traced back in time before the end of the nineteenth century. Failing to observe the historicity of the notion of the subject, and projecting it as a kind of universal category, results, as we shall see, in serious incongruence and anachronisms. The essay outlines a definite view of intellectual history aimed at recovering the radically contingent nature of conceptual formations, which, it alleges, is the still‐valid core of Foucault's archeological project. Regardless of the inconsistencies in his own archeological endeavors, his archeological approach intended to establish in intellectual history a principle of temporal irreversibility immanent in it. Following his lead, the essay attempts to discern the different meanings the category of the subject has historically acquired, referring them back to the broader epistemic reconfigurations that have occurred in Western thought. This reveals a richness of meanings in this category that are obliterated under the general label of the “modern subject”; at the same time, it illuminates some of the methodological problems that mar current debates on the topic.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Argentine</li></country></list><tree><country name="Argentine"><noRegion><name sortKey="Palti, Elias" sort="Palti, Elias" uniqKey="Palti E" first="Elías" last="Palti">Elías Palti</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/EpistemeV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F32 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000F32 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= EpistemeV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:F1A0B9F17A6E9D855C97075CFA269E2B1FA9EBCC
|texte= The “Return of the Subject” As a Historico‐Intellectual Problem
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |